Courts only recognise human authors. And right now, AI tools and platforms are auto-labelling your AI-assisted work as AI Generated - without asking you. Unless you mark your own work first, you are signing your copyright away.
Applied automatically. No consent requested. No nuance recorded.
In response to transparency legislation like the EU AI Act, technology giants are complying with blanket labels that make no distinction between AI-assisted and AI-generated:
“Copyright requires work to be authored in the first instance by a human being to be eligible for copyright registration.”
Thaler v. Perlmutter - United States Court of Appeals, 2025
Australia: the Copyright Act 1968 deems the owner of copyright to be "the author was a qualified person at the time when the work was made" (Copyright Act 1968).
United Kingdom: according to the CDPA, the requirement for originality and the term of protection are both predicated on the author being a natural person (ICLG).
Once your work is labelled "AI Generated", the law no longer sees a human author. You cannot claim ownership of it, and you have no recourse to prevent it being reused, because the copyright protections that would normally apply do not attach.
Applying a nuanced classification over the top of your work records, before you publish it, clarifies your involvement and overrides the blanket label's story.


Classify your work with the AIUC Navigator and publish with your recognition - and your rights - intact.